Skip to main content
Qipu

James R. Herman Cruise Terminal (Pier 27)

Cruise terminal

James R. Herman Cruise Terminal (Pier 27) (cruise terminal, run by the Port of San Francisco): $1.1M paid to contractors for work here, $156.4M budgeted for its department in FY2025, 304 employees on the payroll, 2 contracts, 2 capital projects, 5 city documents at the Internet Archive, every figure linked to its source. A cruise terminal at Pier 27 was proposed long before it was built. A supplemental environmental report for a cruise terminal and mixed-use project, tied to the Waterfront Land Use Plan certified in January 1997, was published in draft in November 2001 and certified in November 2002 — and then the plan changed. The Port's capital plan for 2012-21 describes a new strategy for bringing a cruise terminal to Pier 27, and in 2011 the Port Commission was taking public comment on a notice of preparation for a combined environmental review of the Pier 27 cruise ship terminal and the 34th America's Cup. That review, case 2010.0493E, covering the James R. Herman Cruise Terminal and Northeast Wharf Plaza, went to comments and responses on 1 December 2011 and was certified a fortnight later. What exists now is terminal and public space together: by 2015 the executive director's report is announcing a free symphony concert at Cruise Terminal Plaza and receiving a status report on activity at the terminal and Pier 35. The contracts recorded against the pier are for its public art — the artist Ana Teresa Fernandez engaged at $234,890 and paid $229,585 — set against a capital plan that had newly recognised a $40 million need for the Port's under-pier utility infrastructure. Source: SF Controller open data and the Internet Archive.

James R. Herman Cruise Terminal (Pier 27)Wikimedia Commons · Missvain · CC0
Grounded summary

A cruise terminal at Pier 27 was proposed long before it was built. A supplemental environmental report for a cruise terminal and mixed-use project, tied to the Waterfront Land Use Plan certified in January 1997, was published in draft in November 2001 and certified in November 2002 — and then the plan changed. The Port's capital plan for 2012-21 describes a new strategy for bringing a cruise terminal to Pier 27, and in 2011 the Port Commission was taking public comment on a notice of preparation for a combined environmental review of the Pier 27 cruise ship terminal and the 34th America's Cup. That review, case 2010.0493E, covering the James R. Herman Cruise Terminal and Northeast Wharf Plaza, went to comments and responses on 1 December 2011 and was certified a fortnight later. What exists now is terminal and public space together: by 2015 the executive director's report is announcing a free symphony concert at Cruise Terminal Plaza and receiving a status report on activity at the terminal and Pier 35. The contracts recorded against the pier are for its public art — the artist Ana Teresa Fernandez engaged at $234,890 and paid $229,585 — set against a capital plan that had newly recognised a $40 million need for the Port's under-pier utility infrastructure.

Built from: 5 archive documents, 2 contracts, city budget data — no outside knowledge added.
$1.1M
paid to contractors for work here

Pier 27 · City-owned · 436,042 sq ft · 5 buildings on site · parcel 9900070 · District 3 · City Facilities registry

What public money did here
Paid to contractors for work here$1.1M
G.y. Engineering CoFY2020$843,260
Ana Teresa FernandezFY2024–2026$229,585
One Hat One Hand Llc Dba Scene 2FY2026$20,474

What the City actually paid, across 3 contractors. Contractors big enough to have their own page are linked; the rest are named only.

The contracts that name this place2
PAPO-Port Pier 27 ACANA TERESA FERNANDEZ · ART$229,585PAPO-Port Pier 27 ACONE HAT ONE HAND LLC DBA SCENE 2 · ART$20,474

Every line opens that contract’s own page, with its spend curve and its subcontractors. Agreed amounts are ceilings, not spending.

Run by the Port, whose whole-department budget is $156.4M across 304 staff (FY2025) — citywide, not this place’s own. The City does not publish a running cost per building.

In the archive

2 procedural records — minutes, agendas, calendars — not listed.

Same kind